The Florida legislature recently passed SB 1084 to create clarity and more consistent legal standards for emotional support animals (ESA) in housing. On July 1, 2020, the law went into effect. This article discusses some of the most significant aspects of the new law.
People with disabilities and disability-related needs for an ESA are entitled to reasonable accommodations to have the animal, which cannot be deemed a “pet” for purposes of exclusion or fees. Landlords, property managers and community associations should understand the statute to comply with the rights of tenants and homeowners under fair housing and disability laws. Following the law will avoid costly penalties for legal violations as well as better prevent fraud regarding the misclassification of pets as ESA, which has been a growing problem in recent years.
This new law narrowly relates to ESA, not service animals or assistance animals. Though many use the terms interchangeably, they have different legal meanings which should be understood.
An ESA may be any species that provides comfort to people with disabilities by addressing a disability-related need. The new Florida law defines an ESA as “an animal that does not require training to do work, perform tasks, provide assistance, or provide therapeutic emotional support by virtue of its presence, which alleviates one or more identified symptoms or effects of a person’s disability.”
The use of an ESA must be supported by a qualified physician or mental health professional based on a disability-related need. Under federal and Florida law, the disabled are entitled reasonable accommodations for ESA in housing and air travel.
Under the Americans with Disabilities Act, a service animal is a dog or miniature horse trained to do work or perform tasks for the benefit of a disabled person. Service animals enjoy broader legal protections and are entitled to greater accommodations and access to public places than ESA.
Multiple federal laws and Florida law require reasonable housing accommodations for assistance animals. They are defined as animals that work or provide assistance for the benefit of persons with disabilities or give emotional support to alleviate identified symptoms of disabilities. Previously, I wrote about legal issues relating to assistance animals in housing here.
The new Florida statute sets forth the proper criteria to determine whether an ESA applicant has a disability. If a disability is not readily apparent, the person may be required to give reliable information that reasonably supports its existence.
Various types of supporting documentation may be offered. The list includes a determination of disability from a government agency, proof of eligibility for financial housing assistance based on a disability, and information from a qualified health care provider with personal knowledge of the person’s disability, among other acceptable forms of evidence.
In addition to defining criteria to determine a disability exists, the law delivers guidance on establishing that a person has a disability-related need for the ESA. A qualified health care provider may be asked to identify the particular assistance or therapeutic emotional support the animal gives. As with determining the existence of the disability itself, such information is considered reliable if the practitioner has personal knowledge of the disability and acts within the scope of treating the disabled person.
The law also establishes new protections for ESA applicants. It prohibits housing providers from requesting certain kinds of information, including medical records, relating to the claimed disability. The applicant may not be required to use a specific form and a request can’t be denied solely for not following a routine method for supplying supporting information.
Housing professionals lobbied for legal reforms to address a growing pattern of abuse and fraud with ESA. Many have sought to avoid landlord and community association prohibitions against pets by claiming their animals to be ESA. In response to these practices, the law creates more consistent standards for qualifying ESA and new penalties for false claims.
These anti-fraud reforms include making it a misdemeanor to knowingly providing false information or otherwise misrepresent oneself as having a disability or disability-related need for an ESA. A healthcare professional who states that a person has a disability or need for an ESA without personal knowledge of the disability is now subject to disciplinary action.
Significantly, the new statute addresses the proliferation of a cottage industry of certifying authorities selling ESA certificates without standards. It has become easy to download certificates online without submitting legitimate proof of a disability or related ESA need. Now, an ESA registration or certificate of any kind, by itself, is insufficient to establish a person has a disability or disability-related need for an ESA.
The new law seems to balance the rights and legitimate needs of disabled people with clearer guidance and protections for housing providers. If you have questions about the impacts of the new law or you are a landlord, property manager or community association board member concerned with complying with fair housing and disability rights laws, please contact me.
Creating Joy, One Toy at a Time! On December 12th, Widerman Malek team members proudly…
Many small businesses are required to report their beneficial ownership information (BOI) to the Financial…
A new addition to the family is an incredible blessing. With this precious gift comes…
Trademark protection is designed to secure a business asset that is unique to your business…
So … you are purchasing a home or other piece of residential real estate in…
Litigation can be a lengthy, costly, and emotionally draining process. As an attorney who practices…